Parenting Article Comparison: ‘Putting Fathers in the Frame’ and ‘Dads Army’ Essay

The following shall compare to phrases about the spick-and-span geezerhood father. A virgin historic period father is one that does most work looking after the chela of the family. Dads ground forces is an oblige from a popular magazine written by Damon Syson that shows separate of these new age fathers and his view that all new age fathers should put down the pappoose. The different an article called Putting Fathers in the Frame by Elizabeth Grice from The Daily Telegraph, that tells us thither is no such thing as the new age father and tells us that there should be more(prenominal) than of them.The essay shall find similarities and struggles between the deuce articles considering several factors layout, language, and any other relevant comparisons. Firstly we ordure consider the layout of both articles. The pictures in the article Dads armament surround the briny article and are of tawdry new age fathers in which there are quite a few. This is completely different t o what the article in the Daily Telegraph that only has one that cracks a joke about fathering.Another difference includes varying spaces between lines, bigger spaces in the magazine article than the newspaper article. One of the main differences includes the narrative. Dads Army is written in first person and has the views and opinions of the writer, a man. Putting Fathers in the Frame is written in the third person and less personal and direct and doesnt refer as much to the writer, a womans opinions. The magazine article uses celebrities and young men to back up his opinions and evidence of new age fathers like Jude Law and David Beckham.This is different to the newspaper article that refers to Prince Charles and unknown professionals to back up its point. Dads Army uses much more easier vocabulary than Putting Fathers in the Frame in which the vocabulary is far more sophisticated. There is also one more difference within the structure and form of the articles. Putting Fathers in the Frame uses hyphens to create a perfect column where the magazine article doesnt, a word is to a fault big it leads on the next line. The two articles do not only make differences, they do contain a number of similarities.The paragraph length varies in both articles however they do seem almost the identical length. Both articles have the use of italics, capital lettering, and rhetorical questioning. The language of the two articles are real different, Putting Fathers in the Frame puts down the second-rate father almost telling us that the new age father no longer exists and promotes the idea. This is different to Dads Army that puts down the idea of new age fathering, and tells fathers to act normally.This conflict of belief allows brutal language for new age fathers and supportive to normal dads in Dads Army and vice versa for Putting Fathers in the Frame smug dads just put down the papoose and get over it and sick of acting like theyre the Neil Armstrong of nighfeeds The se words within these quotes smug and Neil Armstrong authentically put down these new age men whereas the newspaper article really puts them up there and promotes them Many fathers who have wiped a lot of noses (in other words been a new age father) providefeel aggrieved to be told they are backsliders This quote from Putting Fathers in the Frame really does give the sense that being a new age father is a good thing. Dads Army promotes normal dads the same way the newspaper article promotes new age fathers Its no walk in the commonalty This tells us that being a new age father isnt easy and its embarrassing to live up to it, normal fathers just do as best as they can for their children, isnt that good enough? Putting Fathers in the Frame on the other hand puts down the average father The slobs are backand appalling self-assessment for it seems his type spends less than five minutes.. with his child So with both articles having different viewpoints and opinions we get different language for the two groups. The two articles content varies too. As the newspaper article is written by a woman, it is difficult for her to make a necessary judgement on the tailor of new age fatherhood, so relies on a number of statistics to back up her point, and uses the views of an expert Mr Parsons, decision maker director of Care for the Family, a family charity.This can be compared with the magazine article Dads Army in which the main bulk of the article is in fact the writers view, and uses a regular father. Overall the two articles have genuinely conflicting views of the so-called new age father and so have very different true content. So the varying views conflict yet share the same topic- fatherhood.